Pre-PMF prototyping when you can't articulate what you want until you see it, your scope is straightforward CRUD + auth, and you'll throw the codebase away later.
ObsCode vs Lovable.dev
Lovable generates a working prototype from a prompt; ObsCode ships production AI architecture that survives 100 customers.
When your MVP needs real AI architecture decisions, agent orchestration, RAG eval, multi-tenant RLS, cost-routing across model providers, and the founder reading this knows what those words mean.
Side-by-side
Where the differences matter.
| Factor | Lovable.dev | ObsCode |
|---|---|---|
| Time to first demo | Minutes | Days (scope) → weeks (production) |
| Output | Generated codebase you edit further | Production-deployed system with monitoring |
| AI-native architecture | Templated | Custom, LangGraph, cost-routing, eval harness |
| Multi-tenant infrastructure | Out of scope | Core competency (RLS, workspaces, billing) |
| Cost | $20–100/mo subscription | from $6k fixed Core MVP |
| Code ownership | Yours, but generated, you maintain | Yours, and engineered by a human you can call |
| Best for stage | Pre-PMF prototyping | Pre-seed / seed shipping their first real product |
We use tools like Lovable internally for spikes. They're a great prototyping layer. They're not a replacement for senior engineering decisions when the production version of your AI-native MVP needs to survive 100 paying customers, that's where we come in.
Still deciding between ObsCode and Lovable.dev?
Send a 2-min Loom about your project. We'll Loom back within 24h with an honest take, including when you should pick the other option.
Send a 2-min Loom →
Core MVP shipped to production by week 4.
or send a 2-min Loom →or email hello@obsidiancode.io